The Biz Bucks Blog provides former Biz Bucks students and other busy professionals with a summary and commentary of seminal articles from the opinion pages of the Wall Street Journal. You can be notified of a new posting by subscribing to the blog (enter email in box on right) or by following on Twitter: @BizBucksGuy.

My New Best Friend, Steve Koonin! April 21, 2017 1:00 PM | Tagged as Koonin
  • WSJ 21 April 2017 “A Red Team Exercise Would Strengthen Climate Science” by Steven Koonin
  • Also view Opinion Journal at “How Government Twists Climate Statistics” with Mary Kissel (video)
  • Also view Opinion Journal at “The Climate Change Debate You Never Hear About” with Mary Kissel (video)

In several posts on this blog, The Biz Bucks Guy has been advocating for years to have a true debate about climate science or the lack of it. Finally, someone with street chops on this matter is advocating the same thing. Mr. Koonin is a physicist and former undersecretary of energy during President Obama’s first term. He knows firsthand the government suppression of facts confounding climate alarmism.

For example, only older climate scientists are free to express opinions that are contrary to the orthodoxy of our government because they are no longer beholden to the money spigot from Washington. Younger scientists must promote the ideology or lose funding. Everybody knows this conspiracy exists. Everybody knows it is not about science anymore, it’s politics.

In the two videos cited above, Koonin throws both NASA and NOAA under the bus. Their data cannot be trusted. Insert how the 16-year hiatus of warming went away recently when NOAA changed their calculations of warming to include highly suspect cruise-ship water intake temperatures, replacing the more accurate and traditional satellite data. Poof! No more hiatus.

In the article cited, Koonin suggests a Red Team/Blue Team project. A Red Team will consist of credentialed scholars who suggest the hysteria surrounding climate is unfounded. A Blue Team of scholars will represent the opposite view.

The process goes as follows: The Blue Team would propose a government study on climate that clearly supports the hysteria, such as the US National Climate Assessment or the latest report from the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The Red Team would provide a corresponding retort to the study. The Blue Team would respond in kind and iterations would proceed until diminishing returns are achieved. Each side’s input would be transparent. All could read the progress of the debate.

The results would be clear to everyone. Policy makers would have solid direction for debating legislation.

And the media might even be truthful for a change. What a concept!

[Although opinion is included, The Biz Bucks Blog is primarily written to former students of Biz Bucks training courses to encourage their daily reading of the three opinion pages of the WSJ. This refreshes principles of Biz Bucks courses and improves business acumen on topics not discussed in Biz Bucks training.]

Posted By The Biz Bucks Guy
Posted in Global Warming | 0 Replies

Subscribe to Our Blog

To receive email updates when a new post is made, please enter your email address in the box below and click Subscribe.


Use these key words to search past blogs:



1994 97% Alesina Recession Alinsky Allesina austerity Baloney BAT Binz bird kills Bogle Border Adjustment Tax Brulle Bryce capitalism carbon Carbon Dioxide CBO CFTC chains China Churchill Climate Climate Change Clinton Comparative Advantage Crichton Cronyism Cummins Curry Darwin Death panel demographics population economics Denier derivatives Dodd-Frank Drug dynamic Dynamic Scoring education electric car Energy Energy Policy Enron Debt Entitlements Eugenics Fat Fry Flat Earthers fracking free markets free trade Free Trade E-Verify Free Trade Zoellick Freedom Heritage Foundation Friedman gas lines Gas Prices glaciers Global Warming Global Warming Sustainability global warming subsidies IMF Globalization Trade God Google Gore Gramm Green Blob Grifo Groupthink Growth Hannity Hayek Hostess Hybrid Immigration Imports index funds Indexing Intellectual Denial investing investment IPCC JFK Joint Tax Kennedy Kerry Keynes Keynesian Keynesian Tax Cuts King Barak Bird Kills Koch Koonin Laffer Lamar Smith Lomborg macroeconomics macroeconomics;static; dynamic MACT Makiel markets Marxist medical care minimum wage Mitchell Model T Moore Morgenthau Navarro Neumark NOAA NY Times Obamacare ObamaCare Rove Health Insurance O'Reilly participation rate Patrick Moore peer review Peer Review EPA Piketty Pipelines plywood Presidential authority Price Controls Pruitt Racial divide Rare Earth Reagan Recession REE Renewable Portfolio Standards Renewables Ricardo Ridley robotics RPS Ryan Schlaff Science science integrity scoring Settled Science Shaffer shortages socialism socialized medicine Solar Panels Solvaldi Sovaldi static steel STEM Stephens Steyer stimulus subsidies subsidy sugar Supreme Creator tax policy tax reform Taylor territorial taxes corporate taxes Tesla Trade train wreck Trump unemployment wages Wind wind power women Zuckerman