The Biz Bucks Blog provides former Biz Bucks students and other busy professionals with a summary and commentary of seminal articles from the opinion pages of the Wall Street Journal. You can be notified of a new posting by subscribing to the blog (enter email in box on right) or by following on Twitter: @BizBucksGuy.
Which Gender Gets the Most Pay? October 5, 2015 8:00 AM | Tagged as women
WSJ October 1, 2015, Page A17: “The ‘Wage Gap’ Myth That Won’t Die” by Sarah Ketterer
Governor Jerry Brown of California is about to sign into state law CA’s Fair Pay Act. This act purports to right the ongoing wrong that women are paid less than men. Ketterer runs the numbers and finds a different answer. The allegation that women make 79% of men, nationally, is bogus. Consider these facts:
1. Women work fewer hours and the statistics don’t correct for that.
2. In many cities, single women under 30 earn 8% more than their male counterparts.
3. Women dominate nine of the ten lowest paid careers. They chose those careers in college.
4. Men dominate nine of the ten highest paid careers. For eight of them, 70% are men. Generally, women choose not to pursue Petroleum Engineering, for example.
5. Many women choose to delay a career during their child-rearing years, giving them a late start on the career ladder. And having the title ‘Outstanding Mother’ is just as important as being a manager at Good Ol’ Amalgamated.
Now in California, employers will need to justify any allegation of underpayment to women. The proof will be difficult. The data gathering onerous. Regulations again hinder businesses. Fewer jobs will be available, jobs that women might have gotten. Once again the Law of Unintended Consequences hits again. Great stuff, Sacramento. (The national version of this Fair Pay Act was scuttled by Congress last year.)
The Biz Bucks Guy remembers twenty-five years ago when he worked for a 7000-employee company where national searches were done to find women qualified to take middle-management positions. This was to meet equal-opportunity quotas. Several outstanding male candidates within the company ranks were overlooked. The salary offers given to women were higher, not lower, than offered to men. It was a simple matter of supply and demand.
One time, a position had to be filled with a minority to meet quota. A talented woman was passed over. She cried, “Reverse discrimination.” The Biz Bucks Guy said, “Welcome to the club.” Reverse discrimination is discrimination.
Government is really good at the Law of Unintended Consequences and it doesn’t take a legislative act to implement it. It just sorta comes with other legislative acts.
[Although opinion is included, The Biz Bucks Blog is primarily written to former students of Biz Bucks training courses to encourage their daily reading of the three opinion pages of the WSJ. This refreshes principles of Biz Bucks courses and improves business acumen on topics not discussed in Biz Bucks training.]
Posted in MacroEconomics | 0 Replies
To receive email updates when a new post is made, please enter your email address in the box below and click Subscribe.
Use these key words to search past blogs:
1994 97% Alesina Recession Alinsky Allesina austerity Baloney BAT Binz bird kills Bogle Border Adjustment Tax Brulle Bryce capitalism carbon Carbon Dioxide CBO CFTC chains China Churchill Climate Climate Change Clinton Comparative Advantage Crichton Cronyism Cummins Curry Darwin Death panel demographics population economics Denier derivatives Dodd-Frank Drug dynamic Dynamic Scoring education electric car Energy Energy Policy Enron Debt Entitlements Eugenics Fat Fry Flat Earthers fracking free markets free trade Free Trade E-Verify Free Trade Zoellick Freedom Heritage Foundation Friedman gas lines Gas Prices glaciers Global Warming Global Warming Sustainability global warming subsidies IMF Globalization Trade God Google Gore Green Blob Grifo Groupthink Growth Hannity Hayek Hostess Hybrid Immigration Imports index funds Indexing Intellectual Denial investing investment IPCC JFK Joint Tax Kennedy Kerry Keynes Keynesian Keynesian Tax Cuts King Barak Bird Kills Koch Koonin Laffer Lamar Smith Lomborg macroeconomics macroeconomics;static; dynamic MACT Makiel markets Marxist medical care minimum wage Mitchell Model T Moore Morgenthau Navarro Neumark NOAA NY Times Obamacare ObamaCare Rove Health Insurance O'Reilly participation rate Patrick Moore peer review Peer Review EPA Piketty Pipelines plywood Presidential authority Price Controls Pruitt Racial divide Rare Earth Reagan Recession REE Renewable Portfolio Standards Renewables Ricardo Ridley robotics RPS Ryan Schlaff Science science integrity scoring Settled Science Shaffer shortages socialism socialized medicine Solar Panels Solvaldi Sovaldi static steel STEM Stephens Steyer stimulus subsidy sugar Supreme Creator tax policy Taylor territorial taxes corporate taxes Tesla Trade train wreck Trump unemployment wages Wind wind power women Zuckerman