The Biz Bucks Blog provides former Biz Bucks students and other busy professionals with a summary and commentary of seminal articles from the opinion pages of the Wall Street Journal. You can be notified of a new posting by subscribing to the blog (enter email in box on right) or by following on Twitter: @BizBucksGuy.


The Fallacy of Settled Science July 31, 2015 11:00 AM | Tagged as Denier, Settled Science

WSJ 31 July 2015, page A11: “The Unsettling, Anti-Science Certitude on Global Warming” by John Steele Gordon

In his piece, Gordon debunks the entire notion of settled science, particularly as it relates to climate science. There is no such thing as settled science in any field. Science’s role is to discover new truths and amend every current theory, principle, axiom, or postulate held as common knowledge by the general populous. Certainly, climate science is anything but settled.

Here are some questions Gordon proposes, honest questions that science is struggling to answer:

  •  “Why did the warming trend between 1978 and 1998 cease, although computer climate models predict steady warming?
  • How sensitive is the climate to increased carbon-dioxide levels?
  • What feedback mechanisms are there that would increase or decrease that sensitivity?
  • Why did episodes of high carbon-dioxide levels in the atmosphere earlier in Earth’s history have temperature levels both above and below the average?”

To question is part of science. Anyone who labels those who question as “deniers” is himself or herself an anathema to true science. Why do people use the inflammatory language of “settle science” and “denier”? In Gordon’s words,

“Well, one powerful explanation…is obvious: self-interest.

“If anthropogenic climate change is a reality, then that would be a huge problem only government could deal with. It would be a heaven-sent opportunity for the left to vastly increase government control over the economy and the personal lives of citizens.”

Gordon also refers to the intellectual corruption shown in two batches of emails from climate alarmists made public in 2009 and 2011. These climate scientists discuss how to “hide the decline” [of warming] from the public, how to deal with sceptics, and how to suppress unfavorable data.  Long ago, the radical environmental left took over the university grant money industry. These scientists are trying to keep intact their feathered nest of constant income. If that’s what science has become, the field is dead.

[Although opinion is included, The Biz Bucks Blog is primarily written to former students of Biz Bucks training courses to encourage their daily reading of the three opinion pages of the WSJ. This refreshes principles of Biz Bucks courses and improves business acumen on topics not discussed in Biz Bucks training.]


Posted By The Biz Bucks Guy
Posted in Global Warming, Science | 0 Replies

Subscribe to Our Blog

To receive email updates when a new post is made, please enter your email address in the box below and click Subscribe.


Keywords

Use these key words to search past blogs:


Archive:


Category:


1994 97% Alesina Recession Alinsky Allesina austerity Baloney BAT Binz bird kills Bogle Border Adjustment Tax Brulle Bryce capitalism carbon Carbon Dioxide CBO CFTC chains China Churchill Climate Climate Change Clinton Comparative Advantage Crichton Cronyism Cummins Curry Darwin Death panel demographics population economics Denier derivatives Dodd-Frank Drug dynamic Dynamic Scoring education electric car Energy Energy Policy Enron Debt Entitlements Eugenics Fat Fry Flat Earthers fracking free markets free trade Free Trade E-Verify Free Trade Zoellick Freedom Heritage Foundation Friedman gas lines Gas Prices glaciers Global Warming Global Warming Sustainability global warming subsidies IMF Globalization Trade God Google Gore Gramm Green Blob Grifo Groupthink Growth Hannity Hayek Hostess Hybrid Immigration Imports index funds Indexing Intellectual Denial investing investment IPCC JFK Joint Tax Kennedy Kerry Keynes Keynesian Keynesian Tax Cuts King Barak Bird Kills Koch Koonin Laffer Lamar Smith Lomborg macroeconomics macroeconomics;static; dynamic MACT Makiel markets Marxist medical care minimum wage Mitchell Model T Moore Morgenthau Navarro Neumark NOAA NY Times Obamacare ObamaCare Rove Health Insurance O'Reilly participation rate Patrick Moore peer review Peer Review EPA Piketty Pipelines plywood Presidential authority Price Controls Pruitt Racial divide Rare Earth Reagan Recession REE Renewable Portfolio Standards Renewables Ricardo Ridley robotics RPS Ryan Schlaff Science science integrity scoring Settled Science Shaffer shortages socialism socialized medicine Solar Panels Solvaldi Sovaldi static steel STEM Stephens Steyer stimulus subsidy sugar Supreme Creator tax policy Taylor territorial taxes corporate taxes Tesla Trade train wreck Trump unemployment wages Wind wind power women Zuckerman