The Biz Bucks Blog provides former Biz Bucks students and other busy professionals with a summary and commentary of seminal articles from the opinion pages of the Wall Street Journal. You can be notified of a new posting by subscribing to the blog (enter email in box on right) or by following on Twitter: @BizBucksGuy.
“Settled Science” Takes Another Hit January 4, 2015 8:00 AM | Tagged as God, Settled Science
WSJ December 26, 2014, Page A11: “Science Increasingly Makes the Case for God” by Eric Metaxas
Metaxas‘s article continues to interest The Biz Bucks Guy. Here’s a second take:
The late Carl Sagan said in 1966 there are only two important criteria for a planet to support life. Science believed there were 1021 such planets which met Sagan’s criteria and life on at least one of them should develop without any intervention, at random, from nothing. Sagan and many other theoretical astrophysicists used this overwhelming number to justify their “informed atheism”. But science is now proposing an opposite argument.
Metaxas reveals that science now believes there are over 200 known parameters for a planet to support life, not merely two. Startlingly, the number of planets in the universe that meet this latest criteria are a nice round number: zero. That’s nada, zilch, zip. No planets SHOULD exist with life, including earth. The only explanation is some sort of omnipotent, supreme being.
Metaxas mentions one of these parameters. The earth has its Jupiter, a huge, nearby planet with strong gravity. Jupiter’s gravity acts as a traffic cop for asteroids, pulling them away from earth and allowing our life-supporting environment to last for eons. Without a large planet-neighbor, life on a smaller planet would be unsustainable due to frequent asteroid hits.
After considering these 200+ parameters (without even mentioning the distinct possibility of many more parameters emerging), the odds of ANY planet in the universe meeting the entire set of parameters is, as stated, zero. Random events cannot explain either the existence of life-sustaining Planet Earth or even our orderly universe in general. All this thinking has emerged since the 1966 Time Magazine article proposing God is Dead! Honest scientist-atheists have had their dogma shaken by this statistical analysis.
Quoting Metaxas, “Fred Hoyle, the astronomer who coined the term “big bang,” said that his atheism was “greatly shaken” at these developments. He later wrote that “a common-sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a super-intellect has monkeyed with the physics, as well as with chemistry and biology . . . . The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond question.”
Given this evolution of thinking toward the existence of a creator, it seems the notion of “settled science” that President Obama likes to promulgate is a farce. As most know, there is no such thing as settled science. The nature of science is to learn more about the world around us. Science is not settled regarding the existence of God. Science is also not settled regarding climate change, in spite of President Obama’s political rhetoric. This rhetoric is intended to justify the need for dramatic, expensive, useless, government-bloating, constitution-breaking measures to stem the alleged growth of global warming.
This is the same global warming that has ceased for the last 15 or so years...without government’s help. May this newly found creator (or “super intellect” as Hoyle calls it) save us from the notion of settled science.
[Although opinion is included, The Biz Bucks Blog is primarily written to former students of Biz Bucks training courses to encourage their daily reading of the three opinion pages of the WSJ. This refreshes principles of Biz Bucks courses and improves business acumen on topics not discussed in Biz Bucks training.]
Posted in Science | 0 Replies
To receive email updates when a new post is made, please enter your email address in the box below and click Subscribe.
Use these key words to search past blogs:
1994 97% Alesina Recession Alinsky Allesina austerity Baloney BAT Binz bird kills Bogle Border Adjustment Tax Brulle Bryce capitalism carbon Carbon Dioxide CBO CFTC chains China Churchill Climate Climate Change Clinton Comparative Advantage Crichton Cronyism Cummins Curry Darwin Death panel demographics population economics Denier derivatives Dodd-Frank Drug dynamic Dynamic Scoring education electric car Energy Energy Policy Enron Debt Entitlements Eugenics Fat Fry Flat Earthers fracking free markets free trade Free Trade E-Verify Free Trade Zoellick Freedom Heritage Foundation Friedman gas lines Gas Prices glaciers Global Warming Global Warming Sustainability global warming subsidies IMF Globalization Trade God Google Gore Gramm Green Blob Grifo Groupthink Growth Hannity Hayek Hostess Hybrid Immigration Imports index funds Indexing Intellectual Denial investing investment IPCC JFK Joint Tax Kennedy Kerry Keynes Keynesian Keynesian Tax Cuts King Barak Bird Kills Koch Koonin Laffer Lamar Smith Lomborg macroeconomics macroeconomics;static; dynamic MACT Makiel markets Marxist medical care minimum wage Mitchell Model T Moore Morgenthau Navarro Neumark NOAA NY Times Obamacare ObamaCare Rove Health Insurance O'Reilly participation rate Patrick Moore peer review Peer Review EPA Piketty Pipelines plywood Presidential authority Price Controls Pruitt Racial divide Rare Earth Reagan Recession REE Renewable Portfolio Standards Renewables Ricardo Ridley robotics RPS Ryan Schlaff Science science integrity scoring Settled Science Shaffer shortages socialism socialized medicine Solar Panels Solvaldi Sovaldi static steel STEM Stephens Steyer stimulus subsidies subsidy sugar Supreme Creator tax policy tax reform Taylor territorial taxes corporate taxes Tesla Trade train wreck Trump unemployment wages Wind wind power women Zuckerman