The Biz Bucks Blog provides former Biz Bucks students and other busy professionals with a summary and commentary of seminal articles from the opinion pages of the Wall Street Journal. You can be notified of a new posting by subscribing to the blog (enter email in box on right) or by following on Twitter: @BizBucksGuy.
Obama, Kerry, Alinsky, and the 97% Myth May 27, 2014 9:00 AM | Tagged as 97%, Alinsky
WSJ -- May 27, 2014, page A13: “The Myth of the Climate Change 97%” by Joseph Bast and Roy Spencer
Once again our WSJ op-ed page comes to the rescue. Bast and Spencer debunk the assertion made by many big government zealots – including President Obama, his Secretary of State John Kerry, and even NASA – that 97% of all scientists agree 1) that global warming is happening, 2) that man is the cause, and 3) it’s dangerous.
No such study exists. This myth is the work of the adherents of Saul Alinsky, the author of Rules for Radicals, the 1970’s book that President Obama taught in Chicago during his community organizing days. Alinsky wrote that bending the truth to gain ground in implementing change is OK. And, as Alinksy teaches, if anyone disagrees, use ad hominem attacks to discredit them. It is therefore no surprise that anyone disagreeing with these zealots is a “denier” – referring the same level of insanity of holocaust deniers.
Bast and Spencer review the origins of the 97% figure and also provide references to the imprecision, bias, or lack of scholarly methodology of such studies. They also provide a few contrary references:
1. In a 2012 study, only 39.5% of 1845 meteorologists believe man-made global warming is dangerous.
2. 31,000 scientists (including 9,000 with Ph.D.’s) signed a petition – published in 2009 -- that states "there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of . . . carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate."
Petitions are often circulated by scientists to get others to buy-in to a particular policy stance. This one is by far the largest relating to global warming – and it inconveniently confounds the 97% theory.
As The Biz Bucks Guy has long argued, let’s have an honest debate about the science before we mess up our economy more than we already have. We are talking about generations of problems if we get this wrong.
[Although opinion is included, The Biz Bucks Blog is primarily written to former students of Biz Bucks training courses to encourage their daily reading of the three opinion pages of the WSJ. This refreshes principles of Biz Bucks courses and improves business acumen on topics not discussed in Biz Bucks training.]
Posted in Energy Policy, Global Warming | 0 Replies
To receive email updates when a new post is made, please enter your email address in the box below and click Subscribe.
Use these key words to search past blogs:
1994 97% Alesina Recession Alinsky Allesina austerity Baloney BAT Binz bird kills Bogle Border Adjustment Tax Brulle Bryce capitalism carbon Carbon Dioxide CBO CFTC chains China Churchill Climate Climate Change Clinton Comparative Advantage Crichton Cronyism Cummins Curry Darwin Death panel demographics population economics Denier derivatives Dodd-Frank Drug dynamic Dynamic Scoring education electric car Energy Energy Policy Enron Debt Entitlements Eugenics Fat Fry Flat Earthers fracking free markets free trade Free Trade E-Verify Free Trade Zoellick Freedom Heritage Foundation Friedman gas lines Gas Prices glaciers Global Warming Global Warming Sustainability global warming subsidies IMF Globalization Trade God Google Gore Gramm Green Blob Grifo Groupthink Growth Hannity Hayek Hostess Hybrid Immigration Imports index funds Indexing Intellectual Denial investing investment IPCC JFK Joint Tax Kennedy Kerry Keynes Keynesian Keynesian Tax Cuts King Barak Bird Kills Koch Koonin Laffer Lamar Smith Lomborg macroeconomics macroeconomics;static; dynamic MACT Makiel markets Marxist medical care minimum wage Mitchell Model T Moore Morgenthau Navarro Neumark NOAA NY Times Obamacare ObamaCare Rove Health Insurance O'Reilly participation rate Patrick Moore peer review Peer Review EPA Piketty Pipelines plywood Presidential authority Price Controls Pruitt Racial divide Rare Earth Reagan Recession REE Renewable Portfolio Standards Renewables Ricardo Ridley robotics RPS Ryan Schlaff Science science integrity scoring Settled Science Shaffer shortages socialism socialized medicine Solar Panels Solvaldi Sovaldi static steel STEM Stephens Steyer stimulus subsidy sugar Supreme Creator tax policy Taylor territorial taxes corporate taxes Tesla Trade train wreck Trump unemployment wages Wind wind power women Zuckerman