The Biz Bucks Blog provides former Biz Bucks students and other busy professionals with a summary and commentary of seminal articles from the opinion pages of the Wall Street Journal. You can be notified of a new posting by subscribing to the blog (enter email in box on right) or by following on Twitter: @BizBucksGuy.
Chemotherapy for the Common Cold April 1, 2014 10:00 AM | Tagged as Ridley
WSJ March 28, 2014, Page A13 “Climate Forecast: Muting the Alarm” by Matt Ridley
Once again, the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is publishing a report to alarm the world. As Mr. Ridley, a member of Britain’s House of Lords, reports the IPCC is at least moving a bit toward a more sensible missive.
Their last report (2007) used alarmist anecdotes to attempt to scare the world into drastic policy changes. All of their anecdotes were in error and all were in error in the same direction…alarmism. This is a simple dip stick to know the writers were biased.
Most reasonable assessments of climate change agree warming will continue as it did during the past century, a little over a degree per century. This level of warming is quite adaptable by nature and humans. Many scientists who have the fortitude to swim against the “group think” current believe it is highly debatable of this warming is man-made. Many also conclude this level of warming will be beneficial to us. Ridley recounts that satellites have recorded a 14% increase in greenery on the planet over the past 30 years. Plants are growing faster and using less water with increased C02.
In light of the renewables being economically imprudent, damaging to the environment, and an abuse of land use, “it appears that in our efforts to combat warming we may have been taking the economic equivalent of chemotherapy for a cold.”, Ridley writes.
Ridley chronicles the history of scientific alarmist over such things as the population “bomb”, pesticides, acid rain, falling sperm counts, and even killer bees. In each case, scientists at institutions gained a lot of funding from these scare tactics, but eventually came to converge on the view that the problem was not as bad as advertised. Could it be that the IPCC is starting that same coalescing about global warming?
Posted in Global Warming | 0 Replies
To receive email updates when a new post is made, please enter your email address in the box below and click Subscribe.
Use these key words to search past blogs:
1994 97% Alesina Recession Alinsky Allesina austerity Baloney BAT Binz bird kills Bogle Border Adjustment Tax Brulle Bryce capitalism carbon Carbon Dioxide CBO CFTC chains China Churchill Climate Climate Change Clinton Comparative Advantage Crichton Cronyism Cummins Curry Darwin Death panel demographics population economics Denier derivatives Dodd-Frank Drug dynamic Dynamic Scoring education electric car Energy Energy Policy Enron Debt Entitlements Eugenics Fat Fry Flat Earthers fracking free markets free trade Free Trade E-Verify Free Trade Zoellick Freedom Heritage Foundation Friedman gas lines Gas Prices glaciers Global Warming Global Warming Sustainability global warming subsidies IMF Globalization Trade God Google Gore Green Blob Grifo Groupthink Growth Hannity Hayek Hostess Hybrid Immigration Imports index funds Indexing Intellectual Denial investing investment IPCC JFK Joint Tax Kennedy Kerry Keynes Keynesian Keynesian Tax Cuts King Barak Bird Kills Koch Koonin Laffer Lamar Smith Lomborg macroeconomics macroeconomics;static; dynamic MACT Makiel markets Marxist medical care minimum wage Mitchell Model T Moore Morgenthau Navarro Neumark NOAA NY Times Obamacare ObamaCare Rove Health Insurance O'Reilly participation rate Patrick Moore peer review Peer Review EPA Piketty Pipelines plywood Presidential authority Price Controls Pruitt Racial divide Rare Earth Reagan Recession REE Renewable Portfolio Standards Renewables Ricardo Ridley robotics RPS Ryan Schlaff Science science integrity scoring Settled Science Shaffer shortages socialism socialized medicine Solar Panels Solvaldi Sovaldi static steel STEM Stephens Steyer stimulus subsidy sugar Supreme Creator tax policy Taylor territorial taxes corporate taxes Tesla Trade train wreck Trump unemployment wages Wind wind power women Zuckerman