The Biz Bucks Blog provides former Biz Bucks students and other busy professionals with a summary and commentary of seminal articles from the opinion pages of the Wall Street Journal. You can be notified of a new posting by subscribing to the blog (enter email in box on right) or by following on Twitter: @BizBucksGuy.
A Tale of Two Islands – Part IV: The Losers February 3, 2014 7:59 AM | Tagged as Comparative Advantage, free trade
WSJ January 6, 2014 Page A11: NAFTA at 20: A Model for Trade Policy by Mary Anastasia O’Grady
WSJ January 13, 2014, Page A15: Leading from the Front on Free Trade by Robert B. Zoellick
So if both islands have benefitted, what’s the rub? There are at least five losers in this free trade deal. They are special interests who want to stand in the way of improving the well-being of the entire island, either from a person’s economic reason or for an ideological reason. They are known as protectionists. They want to protect their special interest, but they frame their arguments as if they are protecting the common citizen of the island.
First, the owners of the apple trees on the Apple Island are not happy. Their investment is going to waste. This is understandable, but progress and improvement of the well-being of the entire island depends on this water bottling operation. Some people will be forced to be flexible with their assets. The unused part of the island the innovative young man bought was from the apple tree owners. Creative destruction is a common phrase for capitalism. This is a good example. No product should be assumed to last forever. Younger minds often are the source of improvement over the older generation.
Second, the head of the apple and oranges pickers union on the apple island is out of a job. His workers are now trained in water bottling and the apple/orange industry is gone. Union leaders often fight free trade agreements.
Third, the Apple Island Environmental Protection Agency is sure the natural spring will run out some day and leave the island bereft of water. Also, they argue the flow into the ocean is good for fishing and stopping it may kill the fish (which the island eats along with their apples and oranges.)
Fourth, the xenophobes on the apple island don’t like the handsome athletes of the orange island coming to work each week and eyeing the apple islands beautiful young daughters. They want to preserve the apple island culture. And they don’t want to have to travel to the orange island to see their grandkids.
Finally, The Tax and Spenders in the island council has long charged heavy tariffs (taxes on imports) on imports from arriving boats at their marina. Now the agreement to bring in apples and oranges and ship out water bottles is free of such tariffs. They have less to spend. They fight such agreements.
[The Biz Bucks Blog is primarily written to former students of Biz Bucks training courses to encourage their daily reading of the three opinion pages of the WSJ. This refreshes principles of Biz Bucks courses and improves business acumen on topics not discussed in Biz Bucks training.]
Posted in Trade | 0 Replies
To receive email updates when a new post is made, please enter your email address in the box below and click Subscribe.
Use these key words to search past blogs:
1994 97% Alesina Recession Alinsky Allesina austerity Baloney BAT Binz bird kills Bogle Border Adjustment Tax Brulle Bryce capitalism carbon Carbon Dioxide CBO CFTC chains China Churchill Climate Climate Change Clinton Comparative Advantage Crichton Cronyism Cummins Curry Darwin Death panel demographics population economics Denier derivatives Dodd-Frank Drug dynamic Dynamic Scoring education electric car Energy Energy Policy Enron Debt Entitlements Eugenics Fat Fry Flat Earthers fracking free markets free trade Free Trade E-Verify Free Trade Zoellick Freedom Heritage Foundation Friedman gas lines Gas Prices glaciers Global Warming Global Warming Sustainability global warming subsidies IMF Globalization Trade God Google Gore Green Blob Grifo Groupthink Growth Hannity Hayek Hostess Hybrid Immigration Imports index funds Indexing Intellectual Denial investing investment IPCC JFK Joint Tax Kennedy Kerry Keynes Keynesian Keynesian Tax Cuts King Barak Bird Kills Koch Koonin Laffer Lamar Smith Lomborg macroeconomics macroeconomics;static; dynamic MACT Makiel markets Marxist medical care minimum wage Mitchell Model T Moore Morgenthau Navarro Neumark NOAA NY Times Obamacare ObamaCare Rove Health Insurance O'Reilly participation rate Patrick Moore peer review Peer Review EPA Piketty Pipelines plywood Presidential authority Price Controls Pruitt Racial divide Rare Earth Reagan Recession REE Renewable Portfolio Standards Renewables Ricardo Ridley robotics RPS Ryan Schlaff Science science integrity scoring Settled Science Shaffer shortages socialism socialized medicine Solar Panels Solvaldi Sovaldi static steel STEM Stephens Steyer stimulus subsidy sugar Supreme Creator tax policy Taylor territorial taxes corporate taxes Tesla Trade train wreck Trump unemployment wages Wind wind power women Zuckerman