The Biz Bucks Blog provides former Biz Bucks students and other busy professionals with a summary and commentary of seminal articles from the opinion pages of the Wall Street Journal. You can be notified of a new posting by subscribing to the blog (enter email in box on right) or by following on Twitter: @BizBucksGuy.
A Tale of Two Islands – Part I: The Discovery January 14, 2014 7:59 AM | Tagged as Comparative Advantage, free trade
WSJ January 6, 2014 Page A11: NAFTA at 20: A Model for Trade Policy by Mary Anastasia O’Grady
WSJ January 13, 2014, Page A15: Leading from the Front on Free Trade by Robert B. Zoellick
[Many thanks to my USC colleague, Janet Suzuki, for the original concept of this great tale. This is the first of a series of five blogs on free trade.]
Economists often have a hard time explaining a few key concepts. Consider this one. Why is free trade good for BOTH trading parties? Here’s the problem. The average person views most issues as zero sum games, meaning the total of the winnings must always equal the total of the losing. Much of life is indeed a zero sum game. Consider any sports event. One winner (+1) , one loser (-1). It adds to zero. Consider the stock market. One seller, one buyer. If the stock goes up, the buyer wins and the seller loses. The net is zero. It is the same from poker to pretzel markets. However, applying zero-sum thinking to free trade yields an erroneous conclusion.
In free trade between nations, both parties win. It is NOT a zero sum game.
Consider this simplest of examples, two islands in the ocean. Neither of the islands knows about the other. One island has one food source: apples. As you can guess from many other staid economic examples, the other island only eats oranges. By happenstance, while in their outriggers one day, the two islands discover each other in the middle of the ocean. Each sees the other’s food in their new neighbor’s outrigger. They taste each other’s food. “IT”S DIFFERENT!” each islander exclaims. They agree to meet in the same place in the ocean on a regular basis and trade apples for oranges.
Question: Who lost?
Answer: Neither lost. Both islands benefitted from trade.
Free trade between nations benefits both nations. In her referenced article above, Mary Anastasia O’Grady of the WSJ chronicled the benefits of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) which turned 20 this month. It is worth the read. Bottom line: All three nations benefitted.
So what is the real discovery of Part I? Yes, they discovered each other and also discovered trade benefits both islands.
The Biz Bucks Guy will expand on this example in forthcoming blogs.
[The Biz Bucks Blog is primarily written to former students of Biz Bucks training courses to encourage their daily reading of the three opinion pages of the WSJ. This refreshes principles of Biz Bucks courses and improves business acumen on topics not discussed in Biz Bucks training.]
Posted in Trade | 0 Replies
To receive email updates when a new post is made, please enter your email address in the box below and click Subscribe.
Use these key words to search past blogs:
1994 97% Alesina Recession Alinsky Allesina austerity Baloney BAT Binz bird kills Bogle Border Adjustment Tax Brulle Bryce capitalism carbon Carbon Dioxide CBO CFTC chains China Churchill Climate Climate Change Clinton Comparative Advantage Crichton Cronyism Cummins Curry Darwin Death panel demographics population economics Denier derivatives Dodd-Frank Drug dynamic Dynamic Scoring education electric car Energy Energy Policy Enron Debt Entitlements Eugenics Fat Fry Flat Earthers fracking free markets free trade Free Trade E-Verify Free Trade Zoellick Freedom Heritage Foundation Friedman gas lines Gas Prices glaciers Global Warming Global Warming Sustainability global warming subsidies IMF Globalization Trade God Google Gore Gramm Green Blob Grifo Groupthink Growth Hannity Hayek Hostess Hybrid Immigration Imports index funds Indexing Intellectual Denial investing investment IPCC JFK Joint Tax Kennedy Kerry Keynes Keynesian Keynesian Tax Cuts King Barak Bird Kills Koch Koonin Laffer Lamar Smith Lomborg macroeconomics macroeconomics;static; dynamic MACT Makiel markets Marxist medical care minimum wage Mitchell Model T Moore Morgenthau Navarro Neumark NOAA NY Times Obamacare ObamaCare Rove Health Insurance O'Reilly participation rate Patrick Moore peer review Peer Review EPA Piketty Pipelines plywood Presidential authority Price Controls Pruitt Racial divide Rare Earth Reagan Recession REE Renewable Portfolio Standards Renewables Ricardo Ridley robotics RPS Ryan Schlaff Science science integrity scoring Settled Science Shaffer shortages socialism socialized medicine Solar Panels Solvaldi Sovaldi static steel STEM Stephens Steyer stimulus subsidy sugar Supreme Creator tax policy Taylor territorial taxes corporate taxes Tesla Trade train wreck Trump unemployment wages Wind wind power women Zuckerman