The Biz Bucks Blog provides former Biz Bucks students and other busy professionals with a summary and commentary of seminal articles from the opinion pages of the Wall Street Journal. You can be notified of a new posting by subscribing to the blog (enter email in box on right) or by following on Twitter: @BizBucksGuy.
ObamaCare: Taxing Away Our Healthy Future July 8, 2013 12:01 PM | Tagged as Obamacare, tax policy
WSJ July 8, 2013, Page A17 – “Another ObamaCare Tax That Is Bad for Your Health” by Burbank and Fogarty
On January 1st this year, ObamaCare imposed a 2.3% tax on medical device companies. That seems to be a small pittance for such a lucrative industry, right? Wrong. The 2.3% is on revenues, not profits. Using the income statement for Johnson and Johnson as a surrogate for a medical device startup (J&J was mentioned in the article), the 2.3% tax on revenues is equivalent to 14.3% on profits. This is on top of the highest corporate income tax rate in the world.
Unlike pharmacological innovations which are the result of large companies, medical devices usually start with a garage-sized lab, a doctor with an idea, and venture capitalist funding.
How many venture capitalists are going to invest in a company with an additional 14.3% tax bogey to overcome? Apparently, not many. Burbank and Fogarty, both doctors who have developed medical devices, note that the VC money has all but dried up in that industry, since the ObamaCare tax.
We have all marveled at the rapid advancements in medicine over our lifetimes. A significant portion is due to innovations in medical devices. The stream of innovation in the US medical industry that has improved the well-being of the entire world is now dry.
How many people will die in the future that would have lived had medical device innovation been allowed to proceed as in the past?
Posted in Health Care | 0 Replies
To receive email updates when a new post is made, please enter your email address in the box below and click Subscribe.
Use these key words to search past blogs:
1994 97% Alesina Recession Alinsky Allesina austerity Baloney BAT Binz bird kills Bogle Border Adjustment Tax Brulle Bryce capitalism carbon Carbon Dioxide CBO CFTC chains China Churchill Climate Climate Change Clinton Comparative Advantage Crichton Cronyism Cummins Curry Darwin Death panel demographics population economics Denier derivatives Dodd-Frank Drug dynamic Dynamic Scoring education electric car Energy Energy Policy Enron Debt Entitlements Eugenics Fat Fry Flat Earthers fracking free markets free trade Free Trade E-Verify Free Trade Zoellick Freedom Heritage Foundation Friedman gas lines Gas Prices glaciers Global Warming Global Warming Sustainability global warming subsidies IMF Globalization Trade God Google Gore Gramm Green Blob Grifo Groupthink Growth Hannity Hayek Hostess Hybrid Immigration Imports index funds Indexing Intellectual Denial investing investment IPCC JFK Joint Tax Kennedy Kerry Keynes Keynesian Keynesian Tax Cuts King Barak Bird Kills Koch Koonin Laffer Lamar Smith Lomborg macroeconomics macroeconomics;static; dynamic MACT Makiel markets Marxist medical care minimum wage Mitchell Model T Moore Morgenthau Navarro Neumark NOAA NY Times Obamacare ObamaCare Rove Health Insurance O'Reilly participation rate Patrick Moore peer review Peer Review EPA Piketty Pipelines plywood Presidential authority Price Controls Pruitt Racial divide Rare Earth Reagan Recession REE Renewable Portfolio Standards Renewables Ricardo Ridley robotics RPS Ryan Schlaff Science science integrity scoring Settled Science Shaffer shortages socialism socialized medicine Solar Panels Solvaldi Sovaldi static steel STEM Stephens Steyer stimulus subsidies subsidy sugar Supreme Creator tax policy tax reform Taylor territorial taxes corporate taxes Tesla Trade train wreck Trump unemployment wages Wind wind power women Zuckerman