The Biz Bucks Blog provides former Biz Bucks students and other busy professionals with a summary and commentary of seminal articles from the opinion pages of the Wall Street Journal. You can be notified of a new posting by subscribing to the blog (enter email in box on right) or by following on Twitter: @BizBucksGuy.

'All in' for Alesina! March 25, 2013 11:00 AM | Tagged as Alesina Recession

WSJ March 14, 2013 “Escape from Spending Hell” by Daniel Henninger

Some years ago, right about the time the Great Recession began, I learned about Economics Professor Alberto Alesina of Harvard. His work studies recessions and government responses to them. He groups the governmental responses into two camps: The Keynesian camp of tax and spend, and the classical camp of lower taxes and lower spending.  Guess which one works? Read Henninger’s piece and you’ll see that cutting spending works. Tax and spend does not.

Mr. Obama is clearly a Keynesian. He believes in the fictitious Keynesian multiplier which purports that for every dollar of government spending, the economy will grow by some multiplier (allegedly greater than 1.0), thus jerking the economy out of its doldrums.  Keynesian’s believe the multiplier is somewhere in the 1.5 range.

However, this is wrong headed. It forgets the government does not have a “money tree” growing on the White House lawn. When you subtract the money that the government took from the productive working class, the Keynesian multiplier is more like 0.5. Yes, there is some growth initially, but it is a blip which quickly dissolves.

Many years ago, when I was about 16, my father was asked to take a few business courses at Arizona State University to help him as a new executive for the large company that fed our family. One night he came home all pumped up about this Keynesian stuff the Econ professor was pushing. He tried to explain it to me. I finally asked – feeling a bit naïve and embarrassed – “Dad, Tell me again how spending money by the government grows an economy?” He eventually quit trying. It was unexplainable.

Too bad Obama doesn’t have the smarts of Max Llewellyn who knew when he had been taught something wrong – something that an inexperienced 16-year old could see through. 

Posted By The Biz Bucks Guy
Posted in MacroEconomics | 1 Reply
Sunday, June 16, 2013 10:05 AM
That might be because none of them are prisnpoog actual tax cuts?As to Labour, a tax cut without a spending cut is just deferred taxation.The Tories are all over the place. They've promised to freeze council tax. Morons. How does that stimulate the economy? Besides overall reduction of deadweight cost of taxation/waste, tax cuts mainly stimulate economy if you cut rates in the future.The Lib Dems have had a couple of good ideas but their bad ideas (increasing green taxes and capital gains tax) cancels it all out again.
Posted by: Emma

Subscribe to Our Blog

To receive email updates when a new post is made, please enter your email address in the box below and click Subscribe.


Use these key words to search past blogs:



1994 97% Alesina Recession Alinsky Allesina austerity Baloney BAT Binz bird kills Bogle Border Adjustment Tax Brulle Bryce capitalism carbon Carbon Dioxide CBO CFTC chains China Churchill Climate Climate Change Clinton Comparative Advantage Crichton Cronyism Cummins Curry Darwin Death panel demographics population economics Denier derivatives Dodd-Frank Drug dynamic Dynamic Scoring education electric car Energy Energy Policy Enron Debt Entitlements Eugenics Fat Fry Flat Earthers fracking free markets free trade Free Trade E-Verify Free Trade Zoellick Freedom Heritage Foundation Friedman gas lines Gas Prices glaciers Global Warming Global Warming Sustainability global warming subsidies IMF Globalization Trade God Google Gore Gramm Green Blob Grifo Groupthink Growth Hannity Hayek Hostess Hybrid Immigration Imports index funds Indexing Intellectual Denial investing investment IPCC JFK Joint Tax Kennedy Kerry Keynes Keynesian Keynesian Tax Cuts King Barak Bird Kills Koch Koonin Laffer Lamar Smith Lomborg macroeconomics macroeconomics;static; dynamic MACT Makiel markets Marxist medical care minimum wage Mitchell Model T Moore Morgenthau Navarro Neumark NOAA NY Times Obamacare ObamaCare Rove Health Insurance O'Reilly participation rate Patrick Moore peer review Peer Review EPA Piketty Pipelines plywood Presidential authority Price Controls Pruitt Racial divide Rare Earth Reagan Recession REE Renewable Portfolio Standards Renewables Ricardo Ridley robotics RPS Ryan Schlaff Science science integrity scoring Settled Science Shaffer shortages socialism socialized medicine Solar Panels Solvaldi Sovaldi static steel STEM Stephens Steyer stimulus subsidies subsidy sugar Supreme Creator tax policy tax reform Taylor territorial taxes corporate taxes Tesla Trade train wreck Trump unemployment wages Wind wind power women Zuckerman