The Biz Bucks Blog provides former Biz Bucks students and other busy professionals with a summary and commentary of seminal articles from the opinion pages of the Wall Street Journal. You can be notified of a new posting by subscribing to the blog (enter email in box on right) or by following on Twitter: @BizBucksGuy.

Once Again, Green has Gone Wrong March 12, 2013 8:00 AM | Tagged as carbon, Global Warming, Hybrid, Lomborg

WSJ March 11, 2013 Page A15, Green Cars Have a Dirty Little Secret, by Bjorn Lomborg

In the Biz Bucks Quarterly (2nd Quarter 2008*), the Biz Bucks Guy did a Net Present Value (NPV) analysis of the then current fad of trading in reciprocating-engine based cars for hybrids. The math was conclusive. The hybrids were overpriced! Those who were compelled to go “green” were being taken by their friendly auto companies. Now Bjorn Lomborg has shown another aspect of going green is worthless.

Those who want to buy a hybrid vehicle to “save the world from global warming” – even though they know they are paying more than they should -- are once again being taken to the environmental cleaners. The claim of “zero emissions” is specious when the total production chain of a hybrid car is put under the common sense microscope.

When a hybrid comes off the assembly line, it has been responsible for about 30,000 pounds of carbon dioxide.  A conventional car causes about 14,000 pounds. One reason, lithium for batteries is hard to mine. Once the lifetimes of the cars are compared, the hybrid may save about 8.7 tons of carbon dioxide. That seems like a big number until you learn that a ton of carbon-dioxide credit on the European trading market is worth about $5. Yep, 8.7 tons times $5 is about $44. Your hybrid saved the world an equivalent of $44. Too bad your friendly Federal government has subsidized that hybrid to the tune of about $7500. The total annual tax bill for nothing in return is about $5.5 billion of your hard earned tax dollars. Dangalangit, your green economy is really wonderful, Mr. Obama,

Mr. Lomborg has once again made the economic case for putting our money – not into current technology – but into research and development where true “green” breakthroughs – ones that make both environmental and economic sense -- may be lurking just around the corner.

* This issue is available at   Go to Biz Bucks Quarterly/Archives.

Posted By The Biz Bucks GUy
Posted in Energy Policy, Global Warming | 0 Replies

Subscribe to Our Blog

To receive email updates when a new post is made, please enter your email address in the box below and click Subscribe.


Use these key words to search past blogs:



1994 97% Alesina Recession Alinsky Allesina austerity Baloney BAT Binz bird kills Bogle Border Adjustment Tax Brulle Bryce capitalism carbon Carbon Dioxide CBO CFTC chains China Churchill Climate Climate Change Clinton Comparative Advantage Crichton Cronyism Cummins Curry Darwin Death panel demographics population economics Denier derivatives Dodd-Frank Drug dynamic Dynamic Scoring education electric car Energy Energy Policy Enron Debt Entitlements Eugenics Fat Fry Flat Earthers fracking free markets free trade Free Trade E-Verify Free Trade Zoellick Freedom Heritage Foundation Friedman gas lines Gas Prices glaciers Global Warming Global Warming Sustainability global warming subsidies IMF Globalization Trade God Google Gore Gramm Green Blob Grifo Groupthink Growth Hannity Hayek Hostess Hybrid Immigration Imports index funds Indexing Intellectual Denial investing investment IPCC JFK Joint Tax Kennedy Kerry Keynes Keynesian Keynesian Tax Cuts King Barak Bird Kills Koch Koonin Laffer Lamar Smith Lomborg macroeconomics macroeconomics;static; dynamic MACT Makiel markets Marxist medical care minimum wage Mitchell Model T Moore Morgenthau Navarro Neumark NOAA NY Times Obamacare ObamaCare Rove Health Insurance O'Reilly participation rate Patrick Moore peer review Peer Review EPA Piketty Pipelines plywood Presidential authority Price Controls Pruitt Racial divide Rare Earth Reagan Recession REE Renewable Portfolio Standards Renewables Ricardo Ridley robotics RPS Ryan Schlaff Science science integrity scoring Settled Science Shaffer shortages socialism socialized medicine Solar Panels Solvaldi Sovaldi static steel STEM Stephens Steyer stimulus subsidies subsidy sugar Supreme Creator tax policy tax reform Taylor territorial taxes corporate taxes Tesla Trade train wreck Trump unemployment wages Wind wind power women Zuckerman