The Biz Bucks Blog provides former Biz Bucks students and other busy professionals with a summary and commentary of seminal articles from the opinion pages of the Wall Street Journal. You can be notified of a new posting by subscribing to the blog (enter email in box on right) or by following on Twitter: @BizBucksGuy.
Babies are Good vs. Babies are Bad February 2, 2013 6:00 PM | Tagged as demographics population economics
WSJ 2/2/2013 page C1 – "America’s Baby Bust" by Jonathan V. Last
As a baby boomer, The Biz Bucks Guy was taught by our 60’s culture that babies are bad. Pseudo-scholars like Paul Ehrlich who wrote the Population Bomb encouraged my generation to stop having babies because we are all going to starve. Ehrlich was wrong. Julian Simon first proved him wrong, academically. Norman Borlaug proved him wrong in practice as he taught the world to feed itself. Ehrlich was a modern-day Malthus, the 18th century English economist who wrongly predicted world starvation.
But because so many believed Ehrlich, we are now engulfed in a more serious cliff…the “under-population” cliff. Demographers, who study population economics, insist that we need somehow to change. Without at least replacement fertility of 2.1, we are headed for economic malaise that will last for decades. 97% of the world lives in a country with fertility below replacement. The US is currently about at replacement (2.05), but if you strip out immigration, the core of the country is at 1.5, about the same as most European countries.
Japan is a perfect example. Declining fertility started early in Japan. In the 80’s everyone thought that Japan was taking over the world. However, tacking into the wind of lower fertility, they have had a lost decade plus five more years.
Look for Jonathan Lust’s book, What to Expect When No One is Expecting.
Perhaps we will soon see the US government advertising on billboards as Australia is doing. Have “2 for the family and 1 for the country.”
Babies are good. Common sense and now population economists say so.
Posted in Demographics | 0 Replies
To receive email updates when a new post is made, please enter your email address in the box below and click Subscribe.
Use these key words to search past blogs:
1994 97% Alesina Recession Alinsky Allesina austerity Baloney BAT Binz bird kills Bogle Border Adjustment Tax Brulle Bryce capitalism carbon Carbon Dioxide CBO CFTC chains China Churchill Climate Climate Change Clinton Comparative Advantage Crichton Cronyism Cummins Curry Darwin Death panel demographics population economics Denier derivatives Dodd-Frank Drug dynamic Dynamic Scoring education electric car Energy Energy Policy Enron Debt Entitlements Eugenics Fat Fry Flat Earthers fracking free markets free trade Free Trade E-Verify Free Trade Zoellick Freedom Heritage Foundation Friedman gas lines Gas Prices glaciers Global Warming Global Warming Sustainability global warming subsidies IMF Globalization Trade God Google Gore Gramm Green Blob Grifo Groupthink Growth Hannity Hayek Hostess Hybrid Immigration Imports index funds Indexing Intellectual Denial investing investment IPCC JFK Joint Tax Kennedy Kerry Keynes Keynesian Keynesian Tax Cuts King Barak Bird Kills Koch Koonin Laffer Lamar Smith Lomborg macroeconomics macroeconomics;static; dynamic MACT Makiel markets Marxist medical care minimum wage Mitchell Model T Moore Morgenthau Navarro Neumark NOAA NY Times Obamacare ObamaCare Rove Health Insurance O'Reilly participation rate Patrick Moore peer review Peer Review EPA Piketty Pipelines plywood Presidential authority Price Controls Pruitt Racial divide Rare Earth Reagan Recession REE Renewable Portfolio Standards Renewables Ricardo Ridley robotics RPS Ryan Schlaff Science science integrity scoring Settled Science Shaffer shortages socialism socialized medicine Solar Panels Solvaldi Sovaldi static steel STEM Stephens Steyer stimulus subsidies subsidy sugar Supreme Creator tax policy tax reform Taylor territorial taxes corporate taxes Tesla Trade train wreck Trump unemployment wages Wind wind power women Zuckerman