The Biz Bucks Blog provides former Biz Bucks students and other busy professionals with a summary and commentary of seminal articles from the opinion pages of the Wall Street Journal. You can be notified of a new posting by subscribing to the blog (enter email in box on right) or by following on Twitter: @BizBucksGuy.
The Two Clinton Presidencies September 10, 2012 8:30 AM | Tagged as 1994, Clinton, macroeconomics
Ref: Wall Street Journal - September 5, 2012, Page A16, Editorial: “Of Bill and Barak”
I lived through the 1990’s under President Clinton. I know what really happened during those years. There were two Clinton presidencies: from 1993 to Nov 1994 (two years) and from Nov 1994 through 2000 (six years).
In the first, Bill was far left. He raised taxes. He tried to nationalize one seventh of the economy through the ill-fated HillaryCare. He raised gas taxes. He avoided fixing welfare. He passed a $31 billion Keynesian stimulus. The economy sunk under the policies of his first presidency.
Then, Bill got what he deserved.
In Nov 1994, the nation rebelled. The Republican takeover of the house signaled the end (for a lengthy time) of big government. That was Bill’s most famous line (except for a few finger wagging quotes from his scandals) which was delayed until his 1996 State of the Union message, “The era of big government is over.”
The economy jumped with the November 1994 election, not because of Bill’s past policies but because of the Republican takeover and the eventual pivot Bill did to the center. Bill and Congress cut spending as a percent of GDP. It was growth not Bill’s tax increase of 1993 that reduced the deficit. Also, Bill was riding the once in a lifetime peace dividend. In 1997, Bill cut the capital gains tax and revenues rushed into the Federal fisc, lowering the deficit even more.
See the curves of interest rates and stock prices in the referenced WSJ article. Things changed in Nov 1994.
History is mostly facts. We need to remember these facts and not the narrative some would have us believe about how Bill gets all the credit for our growing economy of the 1990’s.
Posted in Clinton | 0 Replies
To receive email updates when a new post is made, please enter your email address in the box below and click Subscribe.
Use these key words to search past blogs:
1994 97% Alesina Recession Alinsky Allesina austerity Baloney BAT Binz bird kills Bogle Border Adjustment Tax Brulle Bryce capitalism carbon Carbon Dioxide CBO CFTC chains China Churchill Climate Climate Change Clinton Comparative Advantage Crichton Cronyism Cummins Curry Darwin Death panel demographics population economics Denier derivatives Dodd-Frank Drug dynamic Dynamic Scoring education electric car Energy Energy Policy Enron Debt Entitlements Eugenics Fat Fry Flat Earthers fracking free markets free trade Free Trade E-Verify Free Trade Zoellick Freedom Heritage Foundation Friedman gas lines Gas Prices glaciers Global Warming Global Warming Sustainability global warming subsidies IMF Globalization Trade God Google Gore Green Blob Grifo Groupthink Growth Hannity Hayek Hostess Hybrid Immigration Imports index funds Indexing Intellectual Denial investing investment IPCC JFK Joint Tax Kennedy Kerry Keynes Keynesian Keynesian Tax Cuts King Barak Bird Kills Koch Koonin Laffer Lamar Smith Lomborg macroeconomics macroeconomics;static; dynamic MACT Makiel markets Marxist medical care minimum wage Mitchell Model T Moore Morgenthau Navarro Neumark NOAA NY Times Obamacare ObamaCare Rove Health Insurance O'Reilly participation rate Patrick Moore peer review Peer Review EPA Piketty Pipelines plywood Presidential authority Price Controls Pruitt Racial divide Rare Earth Reagan Recession REE Renewable Portfolio Standards Renewables Ricardo Ridley robotics RPS Ryan Schlaff Science science integrity scoring Settled Science Shaffer shortages socialism socialized medicine Solar Panels Solvaldi Sovaldi static steel STEM Stephens Steyer stimulus subsidy sugar Supreme Creator tax policy Taylor territorial taxes corporate taxes Tesla Trade train wreck Trump unemployment wages Wind wind power women Zuckerman