The Biz Bucks Blog provides former Biz Bucks students and other busy professionals with a summary and commentary of seminal articles from the opinion pages of the Wall Street Journal. You can be notified of a new posting by subscribing to the blog (enter email in box on right) or by following on Twitter: @BizBucksGuy.


Breaking the Secret Code of Macroeconomics Lingo (Part I: Overview) August 24, 2012 12:00 AM | Tagged as Hayek, Keynesian, macroeconomics

Ref: WSJ 8/23/2012, page A12 Editorial “The Cliff the Keynesians Built”

 

Understanding today’s WSJ editorial is critical to the outcome of the presidential election and needs to be understood.  

 

To understand the lingo of macroeconomics and to reach informed decisions about vital economic issues, readers need a basic taxonomy.  I have provided the basics in three parts, plus an opinion piece.

 

Here’s Part I, a short overview . Part II will be about Keynesians. Part III will be the Hayekians. Part IV will be a Biz Bucks opinion.

 

Unlike microeconomics, macroeconomics is a mess! There are many camps of macroeconomists, Keynesians, Classicals, Monetarists, Supply Siders, Rational Expectationists, and so forth.  These camps vehemently disagree with each other on many issues. However, they tend to group into two broad schools: Keynesians and, for lack of a better term, “Hayekians”.  

 

Politically, the Democrats support Keynesian principles. The Republicans are not so homogeneous. Many moderate Republicans have been “schooled” by the Keynesian school for so long that they fall in line with Democrats on economic issues. The more right wingers of the Republican party, the conservatives, support the Hayekian school. Libertarians tend to be Hayekians.  In fact, Hayek was himself a libertarian.

 

In American politics, Keynesian thought was predominant in the 50’s and 60’s. It was not until Milton Friedman’s life’s work that more common sense macroeconomic principles have been represented in the halls of Congress and the executive branch.  Our current political debate on economics is a clash of these two broad schools.

 

The next two blogs examines the basic principles, the modeling techniques, and the notable adherents of each school. The names of such notables are important, so the reader can identify immediately the bias of a writer.

 

First, the Keynesians.


Posted By The Biz Bucks Guy
Posted in MacroEconomics | 0 Replies

Subscribe to Our Blog

To receive email updates when a new post is made, please enter your email address in the box below and click Subscribe.


Keywords

Use these key words to search past blogs:


Archive:


Category:


1994 97% Alesina Recession Alinsky Allesina austerity Baloney BAT Binz bird kills Bogle Border Adjustment Tax Brulle Bryce capitalism carbon Carbon Dioxide CBO CFTC chains China Churchill Climate Climate Change Clinton Comparative Advantage Crichton Cronyism Cummins Curry Darwin Death panel demographics population economics Denier derivatives Dodd-Frank Drug dynamic Dynamic Scoring education electric car Energy Energy Policy Enron Debt Entitlements Eugenics Fat Fry Flat Earthers fracking free markets free trade Free Trade E-Verify Free Trade Zoellick Freedom Heritage Foundation Friedman gas lines Gas Prices glaciers Global Warming Global Warming Sustainability global warming subsidies IMF Globalization Trade God Google Gore Gramm Green Blob Grifo Groupthink Growth Hannity Hayek Hostess Hybrid Immigration Imports index funds Indexing Intellectual Denial investing investment IPCC JFK Joint Tax Kennedy Kerry Keynes Keynesian Keynesian Tax Cuts King Barak Bird Kills Koch Koonin Laffer Lamar Smith Lomborg macroeconomics macroeconomics;static; dynamic MACT Makiel markets Marxist medical care minimum wage Mitchell Model T Moore Morgenthau Navarro Neumark NOAA NY Times Obamacare ObamaCare Rove Health Insurance O'Reilly participation rate Patrick Moore peer review Peer Review EPA Piketty Pipelines plywood Presidential authority Price Controls Pruitt Racial divide Rare Earth Reagan Recession REE Renewable Portfolio Standards Renewables Ricardo Ridley robotics RPS Ryan Schlaff Science science integrity scoring Settled Science Shaffer shortages socialism socialized medicine Solar Panels Solvaldi Sovaldi static steel STEM Stephens Steyer stimulus subsidy sugar Supreme Creator tax policy Taylor territorial taxes corporate taxes Tesla Trade train wreck Trump unemployment wages Wind wind power women Zuckerman