The Biz Bucks Blog provides former Biz Bucks students and other busy professionals with a summary and commentary of seminal articles from the opinion pages of the Wall Street Journal. You can be notified of a new posting by subscribing to the blog (enter email in box on right) or by following on Twitter: @BizBucksGuy.


Global Warming: Let’s Have a Real Debate! August 14, 2012 12:00 AM | Tagged as Climate Change, Global Warming

 

 

Ref: Wall Street Journal 8/13/12 - Page A14, Letter to Editor  “’Climate Consensus’  Data Need a More Careful Look”  by Cohen, Happer,  and Lindzen

 

In an August 7, 2012 Op-Ed piece, “A New Climate Change Consensus”,  Fred Krupp, President of the Environmental Defense Fund, proclaimed  in so many words that the debate is over about global warming, echoing Al Gore’s famous use of that phrase. Fortunately, there are clearer, more objective minds from which we can learn. Cohen, Happer, and Lindzen are three eminent scholars. They debunked Krupp’s assertion that the data show “decades long march toward hotter and wilder weather.” Data is a pesky thing.  The three scholars point out:

 

1. From 1900 to the present, data show no change in trend from wet or dry years.

2. Last year’s tornado frequency which some attempt to use as “proof” of pending global catastrophe was only the 6th worst since 1950 and is now being followed by a less than normal tornado year, so far.

3.  The UN’s own Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change admits in its latest report “data sets are not yet sufficient for determining long-term trends in [weather] extremes.”

4. Some members of Congress have admitted to bald-face trickery to portray global warming at hearings, including leaving the window open on a hot day.

5.  Many skeptics of global warming are left of center politically. We skeptics are not just "knukle-dragging conservatives", as some would assert.

6. Science has not determined if increased CO2 is even a harmful effect if in fact man-made green house gases were, indeed, changing our climate.

 

Isn’t it time we had a real debate on global warming, rather than this sporadic rifle shots between factions? 

 

The Biz Bucks Guy wishes only for facts and scientific analyses from honest  scholars, including not only physical scientists, but political scientists who could research the biases of those who promote hysteria.

 


Posted By The Biz Bucks Guy
Posted in Global Warming | 0 Replies

Subscribe to Our Blog

To receive email updates when a new post is made, please enter your email address in the box below and click Subscribe.


Keywords

Use these key words to search past blogs:


Archive:


Category:


1994 97% Alesina Recession Alinsky Allesina austerity Baloney BAT Binz bird kills Bogle Border Adjustment Tax Brulle Bryce capitalism carbon Carbon Dioxide CBO CFTC chains China Churchill Climate Climate Change Clinton Comparative Advantage Crichton Cronyism Cummins Curry Darwin Death panel demographics population economics Denier derivatives Dodd-Frank Drug dynamic Dynamic Scoring education electric car Energy Energy Policy Enron Debt Entitlements Eugenics Fat Fry Flat Earthers fracking free markets free trade Free Trade E-Verify Free Trade Zoellick Freedom Heritage Foundation Friedman gas lines Gas Prices glaciers Global Warming Global Warming Sustainability global warming subsidies IMF Globalization Trade God Google Gore Green Blob Grifo Groupthink Growth Hannity Hayek Hostess Hybrid Immigration Imports index funds Indexing Intellectual Denial investing investment IPCC JFK Joint Tax Kennedy Kerry Keynes Keynesian Keynesian Tax Cuts King Barak Bird Kills Koch Koonin Laffer Lamar Smith Lomborg macroeconomics macroeconomics;static; dynamic MACT Makiel markets Marxist medical care minimum wage Mitchell Model T Moore Morgenthau Navarro Neumark NOAA NY Times Obamacare ObamaCare Rove Health Insurance O'Reilly participation rate Patrick Moore peer review Peer Review EPA Piketty Pipelines plywood Presidential authority Price Controls Pruitt Racial divide Rare Earth Reagan Recession REE Renewable Portfolio Standards Renewables Ricardo Ridley robotics RPS Ryan Schlaff Science science integrity scoring Settled Science Shaffer shortages socialism socialized medicine Solar Panels Solvaldi Sovaldi static steel STEM Stephens Steyer stimulus subsidy sugar Supreme Creator tax policy Taylor territorial taxes corporate taxes Tesla Trade train wreck Trump unemployment wages Wind wind power women Zuckerman