The Biz Bucks Blog provides former Biz Bucks students and other busy professionals with a summary and commentary of seminal articles from the opinion pages of the Wall Street Journal. You can be notified of a new posting by subscribing to the blog (enter email in box on right) or by following on Twitter: @BizBucksGuy.

Ask the Blip President August 6, 2012 12:01 PM | Tagged as Keynesian, Laffer, macroeconomics, Morgenthau, stimulus
Ref: Wall Street Journal 8/06/12 - Page A13, Arthur Laffer’s Article, “The Real ‘Stimulus’ Record”
The Keynesian economists purport that government spending stimulates demand and, hence, the economy. The Keynesians believe there is some magical Keynesian “multiplier” that is somewhere in the range of 1.5 or so. They allege for every dollar of stimulus spending, the economy grows an additional 50%.
They forget there is no money tree on the White House lawn to pluck $1billion bills from.

The money is from the private sector. This means the “multiplier” calculation forgets to subtract the money taken from the productive population. The number is really 1.5 minus 1.0 or 50%.

The increased economic gain from demand side government spending is always short lived. It provides a "blip" in the economy and when the blip is over we are left with increased debt.  This blip has been seen many times over decades of demand-side stimulus attempts.  Consider recent attempts of Cash for Clunkers, housing mortgage stimuli, and Obama’s first $860 billion, now stuck on our balance sheet as debt. FDR’s Treasure Secretary, Henry Morgenthau, Jr. said of eight years of government spending to “fix” the 30’s depression,

"We have tried spending money. We are spending more than we have ever spent before and it does not work…We have never made good on our promises. … I say after eight years of this Administration we have just as much unemployment as when we started. … And an enormous debt to boot."

In the referenced article, Arthur Laffer relates the data from thiry-four countries, recounting the amount of increased government “stimulus” spending and correlating it with the negative results. The more a country spent, the greater the decrease in economic output. Laffer and the Biz Bucks Guy ask the cogent question, “Why are they considering another round of stimulus?”
Maybe that’s a good question to ask the “Blip” President.

Posted By The Biz Bucks Guy
Posted in MacroEconomics | 1 Reply
Wednesday, September 5, 2012 6:54 PM
Amen to that! But I doubt he would answer the question--it would be someone's fault though, I'm sure.
Posted by: Bonnie

Subscribe to Our Blog

To receive email updates when a new post is made, please enter your email address in the box below and click Subscribe.


Use these key words to search past blogs:



1994 97% Alesina Recession Alinsky Allesina austerity Baloney BAT Binz bird kills Bogle Border Adjustment Tax Brulle Bryce capitalism carbon Carbon Dioxide CBO CFTC chains China Churchill Climate Climate Change Clinton Comparative Advantage Crichton Cronyism Cummins Curry Darwin Death panel demographics population economics Denier derivatives Dodd-Frank Drug dynamic Dynamic Scoring education electric car Energy Energy Policy Enron Debt Entitlements Eugenics Fat Fry Flat Earthers fracking free markets free trade Free Trade E-Verify Free Trade Zoellick Freedom Heritage Foundation Friedman gas lines Gas Prices glaciers Global Warming Global Warming Sustainability global warming subsidies IMF Globalization Trade God Google Gore Gramm Green Blob Grifo Groupthink Growth Hannity Hayek Hostess Hybrid Immigration Imports index funds Indexing Intellectual Denial investing investment IPCC JFK Joint Tax Kennedy Kerry Keynes Keynesian Keynesian Tax Cuts King Barak Bird Kills Koch Koonin Laffer Lamar Smith Lomborg macroeconomics macroeconomics;static; dynamic MACT Makiel markets Marxist medical care minimum wage Mitchell Model T Moore Morgenthau Navarro Neumark NOAA NY Times Obamacare ObamaCare Rove Health Insurance O'Reilly participation rate Patrick Moore peer review Peer Review EPA Piketty Pipelines plywood Presidential authority Price Controls Pruitt Racial divide Rare Earth Reagan Recession REE Renewable Portfolio Standards Renewables Ricardo Ridley robotics RPS Ryan Schlaff Science science integrity scoring Settled Science Shaffer shortages socialism socialized medicine Solar Panels Solvaldi Sovaldi static steel STEM Stephens Steyer stimulus subsidies subsidy sugar Supreme Creator tax policy tax reform Taylor territorial taxes corporate taxes Tesla Trade train wreck Trump unemployment wages Wind wind power women Zuckerman